Michael Murray is an Australian author and commentator on corporate and personal insolvency law and related issues, in Australia and internationally. He has a strong law and policy background, is independent of any connections, and his views are his own. He gives no legal advice.
This is a free access website containing various on-going commentary about a range of issues in law, legal policy and reform, with some particular emphasis on corporate and personal insolvency, professional regulation, technology, ethics, law reform and the courts and the legislature.
peter@murrayslegal.com.au
m +8613 801 763 568
michael@murrayslegal.com.au
m +61 402 248 353
Copyright 2019 Murrays Legal
Subscribe now
Unpaid super – just rounding up the usual suspects
A Senate Committee has produced yet another typical report that goes round in the usual circles of recommending the implementation of previous recommendations – director identity numbers, more ASIC and ATO exchanges of information, and more “enforcement” and “resources” for the regulators. These are all the familiar and usual suspects in Committee reports, with pliant media in tow.
Reform lies in technology which idea the Committee embraced – moving from the ‘paper age’ to the ‘digital age’ will enable a greater focus on proactive methods – but with no real digital proactivity recommended.
The nub of the report’s limited usefulness is its reference to the digital age process of single touch payroll (STP), by which the employer is relieved of the task of paying the employees’ taxes and super, with the ATO simply extracting the payments up front from the employer’s cash. As the Melbourne and Monash academics have explained, this is how STP was initially proposed.
However, in light of the usual “concerns from the business community” about removing businesses’ access to the interest free ATO money on which they rely for their cash flow, the STP proposal was later watered down to only cover the reporting, not payment, of tax and superannuation obligations, and then only for larger employers. Such routine objections that wages are generally paid fortnightly while PAYG and superannuation are usually remitted monthly or quarterly seem to have been enough for the government to back off.
As the academics say
If the government wants to address unpaid super and a range of other such tax and competition issues, it has to “interfere” with the expectation that employers have access to this money, now a decades long expectation but one that is not warranted in this century. It is easy enough to blame the ATO, when the responsibility lies up the line.
As much as the Senate Committee tentatively suggested, it was that
Wow.
The cute title of the report given by the Senate Committee – “Superbad” – is apt.
Latest
Apprehensions of the fair-minded lay observer – a law reform review of judicial impartiality
The Australian Law Reform Commission has been asked to undertake a review of the laws
Should a person be subject to restrictions after an insolvency?
The default period of restriction on a person following their personal insolvency is under consideration
A proposed change of focus of the Australian Official Trustee in Bankruptcy
The Australian Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (OT) has sought comment on a significant refocus of
Popular
Featured
The Alternative Financial Review
Property prices Perth ‘as good as it’s likely to get’ for rental affordability With little
ASIC’s “significant element of vexation”
ASIC has failed in an application to have an inquiry conducted into joint liquidators’ conduct
Report on targeting of people in financial hardship
The Economics References Committee has issued its report, on time, following its inquiry into ‘Credit