Very leviable liquidators

In anticipating the funding bases for the government meeting ASIC’s costs of regulating insolvency practitioners (IPs), I wrote that there “should be some comfort taken from

Director charades continued

After giving directors the benefit of protection from liability for insolvent trading, through the ‘safe harbour reforms’, the government has not required of directors that

Getting rid of liquidators

While no-one in business likes losing a client or customer, usually, it happens all the time, as a matter of commercial choice. Insolvency practitioners –

Bankruptcy and mental incapacity

A son was obliged to ‘forum shop’ in order to assist his debt-laden father go into voluntary bankruptcy.  The father had suffered a stroke leaving him with severe cognitive

Maritime review of the year

The Murrays Legal were pleased to attend the annual presentation at Norton Rose Fulbright on international maritime law developments given on 22 June 2017 by

Rough bankruptcy justice all round …?

Where a person has wrongly been made bankrupt, the court will usually remedy the problem by setting aside or annulling the bankruptcy.  While the inevitable

The AAT strikes back

Mr Dutton, the immigration minister, has been found wanting in refusing an application by a Mr Singh for a 6 week bridging visa, based upon his conviction

A safe harbour from our harsh insolvency laws?!

The “safe harbour” reform bill has been introduced into federal parliament to address directors’ “medium risk” of liability for insolvent trading.  The reform represents a significant