Confidential settlement of an insolvent trading claim – why?
It would be an act of both supererogation and superfluity to superimpose observations on this synthesis. The Federal Court has approved under s 477(2B) of the Corporations Act a settlement reached by liquidators as to claims made against a former director under ss 588G and 588M and against the relevant holding company under ss 588V […]
A judge’s decision might be just “wrong” – no need to add “vituperative epithets”
In a recent patents law case, concerning veterinary pharmaceuticals, and processes for determining the novelty of a process the subject of a patent application, Justice Ian Jackman declined to follow the reasoning in a 2005 decision of Justice Emmett, saying that single judges of the Federal Court are not bound by decisions of previous single […]